Plan development process, inclusivity, and coordinationĬlarity, readability, and logical structure Quality of the content and scientific basis for adaptation planning doi: Īdditional documents examined in the study: Local climate change adaptation plans in the US and France: comparison and lessons learned in 2007–2017. PCET Ouest 06: CA Sophia Antipolis (CASA), CA du Pays de Grasse (CAPG),ĭata identification number: Mendeley Data, V1, doi: Santa Fe River watershed & Santa Fe County, NM & Santa Fe, NMįrench climate plans on the following cities institutional websites: climate plans on the following cities institutional websites: Primary Data Source (more details on Mendeley Data, V1, doi: ) National databases, institutional websites, and email communications with host agencies KeywordsĮxploitation of national databases, institutional websites, and email communications with host agenciesĬlimate adaptation plans downloaded on cities institutional websites The purpose of this dataset is to provide users with references to examples of strong points of the first generation climate adaptation plans developed between 20 in both countries. To protect information about quality scores of individual planning documents, this published part of our dataset is limited to the essential information about the cities’ profiles and their adaptation plans, with plan assessment results presented in Boolean format instead of actual rating scores, and the highlights of the strong points of each plan (instead of the actual quantitative scores generated in our study). ] as a pilot sample for a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation system developed by the authors, the complete dataset comprises assessment results based on 24 criteria of the plans’ structure, content, and development process.
0 kommentar(er)
